The White House is taking a careful approach towards the oft-misunderstood crypto mining industry.
Bloomberg Law reports that the White House is studying crypto mining and its energy footprint in order to make sound policy recommendations.
The study is also looking into noise, local pollution, and the effect of mining on energy grids.
The head of the study, Costa Samaras, sees the possibility of a world where Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake continuously coexist.
Share this article
A White House task force is currently examining the advantages and disadvantages of cryptocurrency mining with the aim of providing the Biden administration with appropriate policy recommendations.
“Appropriate Policy Responses”
A new Bloomberg Law report claims that the White House is looking into the energy consumption of cryptocurrency mining ahead of making policy recommendations.
According to the report, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy principal assistant director for energy Costa Samaras is heading a study that aims to reach a better understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of cryptocurrency mining while keeping a focus on energy consumption and emissions footprint. The report is expected in August; it follows President Joe Biden’s executive order instructing federal agencies to ensure the “responsible” mining of cryptocurrencies.
“It’s important, if this is going to be part of our financial system in any meaningful way, that it’s developed responsibly and minimizes total emissions,” Samaras told Bloomberg Law. The study also plans to look into “reports about noise, local pollution, older fossil generators being restarted in communities” and compare the merits of Proof-of-Work consensus algorithms to Proof-of-Stake.
Samaras acknowledged that despite being energy-intensive Proof-of-Work offered greater security insurance than its counterparts, indicating the energy team was keeping an open mind while conducting the investigation. He also talked of the need for “appropriate policy responses” to a world in which “some continuous mix of Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake” existed.
The nuance in the White House’s approach contrasts with Greenpeace’s recent campaign, “Change the Code, Not The Climate,” which aggressively advocates for Bitcoin to follow Ethereum in moving away from Proof-of-Work in order to reduce the protocol’s energy consumption. The campaign made a number of dubious claims about Bitcoin’s consumption, using long-debunked reports to argue Bitcoin emissions increase alongside the coin’s market price and could end up pushing global warming above 2 degrees Celsius.
Disclosure: At the time of writing, the author of this piece owned ETH and several other cryptocurrencies.
Share this article
The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information on or accessed through this website. Decentral Media, Inc. is not an investment advisor. We do not give personalized investment advice or other financial advice. The information on this website is subject to change without notice. Some or all of the information on this website may become outdated, or it may be or become incomplete or inaccurate. We may, but are not obligated to, update any outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate information.
You should never make an investment decision on an ICO, IEO, or other investment based on the information on this website, and you should never interpret or otherwise rely on any of the information on this website as investment advice. We strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional if you are seeking investment advice on an ICO, IEO, or other investment. We do not accept compensation in any form for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, currency, tokenized sales, securities, or commodities.