Mirror is currently under attack and may have already lost as much as $2 million.

Key Takeaways

Mirror Protocol is currently suffering its second exploit.
An error in price oracle implementation has allegedly allowed up to $2 million to be siphoned from the protocol.
The situation is ongoing.

Share this article

Mirror Protocol appears to be under attack and may have already lost as much as $2 million. 

Second Exploit News In A Week

Just days after the discovery that Mirror had been exploited for almost $90 million seven months ago, it appears the protocol is suffering another attack. The attacker is apparently taking advantage of the fact that price oracles are mismatching the old LUNC token with the new LUNA token.

News of the exploit was delivered by a Mirror community member, who posted about it in the Mirror community forum, and then quickly circulated by Twitter user FatMan, who discovered the previous Mirror exploit four days ago.

According to FatMan, the hack was possible due to an error in the configuration of price oracles. This was confirmed by Chainlink community member ChainLinkGod, who said oracles are currently “reporting the price of the new Terra 2.0 $LUNA coin (~$9.80) instead of the original Terra Classic $LUNC coin (~$0.0001)”.

FatMan estimates the exploit has already cost Mirror Protocol around $2 million, though as of yet Crypto Briefing has not been able to independently confirm it. It is apparent however that mBTC, mETH, mDOT, and mGLXY pools have been drained of their liquidity.

FatMan and other crypto users have been pleading with the Mirror developers for a call to action before the rest of the mAsset pools, such as mAAPL and mAMZN, are also drained.

Mirror Protocol is a decentralized application that allows for the creation of digital synthetics that track the price of real world assets, such as stocks. Mirror’s core contracts were deployed on Terra Classic, but its assets are available on Ethereum and Binance Smart Chain (BSC). It has previously suffered a $90 million hack which was only discovered seven months after the fact.

This is a developing story. 

Disclosure: At the time of writing, the author of this piece owned BTC, ETH, and several other cryptocurrencies. 

Share this article

The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information on or accessed through this website. Decentral Media, Inc. is not an investment advisor. We do not give personalized investment advice or other financial advice. The information on this website is subject to change without notice. Some or all of the information on this website may become outdated, or it may be or become incomplete or inaccurate. We may, but are not obligated to, update any outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate information.

You should never make an investment decision on an ICO, IEO, or other investment based on the information on this website, and you should never interpret or otherwise rely on any of the information on this website as investment advice. We strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional if you are seeking investment advice on an ICO, IEO, or other investment. We do not accept compensation in any form for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, currency, tokenized sales, securities, or commodities.

See full terms and conditions.

Recommended News

Read More